-
on GOOD
The relationship between a writer and an editor can be a tricky thing. Sometimes — maybe frequently — it’s a big headache for both parties involved. Other times, it’s one of the most incredible experiences you’ll have in your professional life. When I wrote for GOOD magazine, I was edited by Amanda Hess. There was nothing more fun than reading my articles after she was done with them: it was as if she could see into my brain; her changes made me like my thoughts better. After I’d read an essay she’d tweaked, sometimes I would actually like myself better.
I was writing about pot. It was scary. I trusted Amanda, and executive editor Ann Friedman (who took a chance on me and the column in the first place, and to whom I look up not just because she’s very tall but also because she, like Amanda, is just so fucking smart and interesting), and that trust allowed me to be a better writer, to be more honest, and to be a little braver about broaching topics that were covered during the Friedman era with such finesse. I loved to read GOOD as much as I loved to write for it (I have that same sentiment about Grantland). I felt lucky to contribute to GOOD, because there was such immense talent there.
Last night, GOOD had a party for its migration issue. Today, news broke that Amanda and Ann, as well as a number of other staffers, were laid off. I have no idea why this happened. There are ominous clouds forming on the horizon.
Amanda and Ann are two of the most wonderful writers and editors around, and I’m curious to see where they’ll go. I hope they stay in LA, because I like LA better with them here. Wherever they end up will be lucky to have them. I have a folder of essays — the stuff that’s too personal to shove into an email pitch, too long for the blog, too opiniony for a Hollywood Prospectus, and too risky without a glance from that special kind of editor who’s a hundred times smarter than you (who, essentially, teaches you how to be the kind of writer you want to be) — that I hope I can talk Amanda into editing one day, wherever she is. GOOD has lost something irreplaceable, and I can’t help but wonder what will become of it without the people who made it into something so special.
-
mllehazelwood likes this
-
kisslit likes this
-
singyoursight likes this
-
hereisyourdailydosage likes this
-
apleasantsurprise likes this
-
elanormcinerney likes this
-
bonn likes this
-
ghost-writer likes this
-
goddamnedpansies likes this
-
ecantwell likes this
-
good-universe likes this
-
speedandsleep likes this
-
andidigress likes this
-
ohkarolle likes this
-
pairpearpierre reblogged this from tesslynch
-
pairpearpierre likes this
-
aaygeecee likes this
-
sometimesagreatnotion likes this
-
yumwatch likes this
-
matthewgallaway likes this
-
brianvan likes this
-
smoochieboops likes this
-
darcibastiaan reblogged this from tesslynch and added:
Text by Tess Lynch. —————————————————————————————— If I’m asked to take this down, I will. Yet, in the meantime, I think...
-
otherthingsisay likes this
-
shayg11 likes this
-
darcibastiaan likes this
-
ljm likes this
-
chels likes this
-
rachelhills likes this
-
winstonwolfe likes this
-
garethsimpson likes this
-
thedanaash likes this
-
nellingtonboots likes this
-
tmills likes this
-
rustbelts reblogged this from tesslynch and added:
boring, less pleasurable. But...team took similar chances
-
yourfriendsav likes this
-
waxandmilk likes this
-
rustbelts likes this
-
michelledean likes this
-
sarahluz likes this
-
plemur likes this
-
stryker likes this
-
needsmoresalt likes this
-
redisdoomed likes this
-
sea-change likes this
-
greatest-success likes this
-
alanharris likes this
-
fatwasandfanboys likes this
- Show more notes
-
